72.4 F
New York
Friday, October 7, 2022
spot_img
Tina Mironov
Tina Mironovhttps://cinchnews.com
Tina is a young, beautiful and caring womxn living in Portland, Oregon with her two dogs and boyfriend. She spends her nights watching 90 Day Fiance and critiquing her boyfriend's everything. She attended UC Berkley for a month and nearly got a Master's Degree in Journalism and Mass Communication. She considers herself to be the savior of POC and womxn.

Latest Posts

Fauci worried that Americans are rebuilding from destruction of lockdowns

Do we really deserve to rebuild when Dr. Fauci's job is in jeopardy?

Dr. Fauci is a name that makes all Democrats rejoice. He is the person who scared the shit out of us at every turn and made sure nobody got too comfortable. It is important in a pandemic that we do not listen to anyone except the government. And Dr. Fauci.

Unfortunately, the racist and bigoted Johns Hopkins has stepped in with Russian disinformation to make a bold claim that would usurp Dr. Fauci’s throne.

Where is this coming from?

A Johns Hopkins study states,

“This systematic review and meta-analysis are designed to determine whether there is empirical
evidence to support the belief that “lockdowns” reduce COVID-19 mortality. Lockdowns are
defined as the imposition of at least one compulsory, non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI).
NPIs are any government mandate that directly restrict peoples’ possibilities, such as policies that
limit internal movement, close schools and businesses, and ban international travel. This study
employed a systematic search and screening procedure in which 18,590 studies are identified
that could potentially address the belief posed.

After three levels of screening, 34 studies ultimately qualified. Of those 34 eligible studies, 24 qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis. They were separated into three groups: lockdown stringency index studies, shelter-in-place-order (SIPO) studies, and specific NPI studies. An analysis of each of these three groups support the conclusion that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality.

More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only
reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average.
SIPOs were also ineffective, only reducing
COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific NPI studies also find no broad-based evidence
of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.

While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects,
they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.
In
consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy
instrument.”

Here’s the entire study.

Now, knowing this… and understanding that the lockdowns legitimately rearranged the world and everyone’s lives. It destroyed businesses, relationships and it caused a massive amount of suicides.

And the Harbinger of Suicide & Disaster who has decided that he is “the science”, instead of admitting he was part of the biggest mistake in modern world history, is now back on CNN with a dialogue you wouldn’t believe.

Thank God we have him and us Democrats to keep the tension in the country high and wonder why everyone is angry and revolting.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest Posts

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Don't Miss

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x